tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682434583727919151.post6531688244697511095..comments2023-05-04T18:21:28.692+08:00Comments on 享受是: 串燒快歌的成與敗-談《Power Medley》與《Party King》zerohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05335461532009544893noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682434583727919151.post-7808443553162057162012-07-29T14:22:28.150+08:002012-07-29T14:22:28.150+08:00medley係將歌連埋一齊
但多數medley歌與歌之間有明顯分別
可以比人睇到唱完一首落下一首
...medley係將歌連埋一齊<br />但多數medley歌與歌之間有明顯分別<br />可以比人睇到唱完一首落下一首<br /><br />但古巨基式既(?)勁歌金曲就唔同<br />佢較少有間場音樂出現 就算有都好短<br />如果味聽過原曲既觀眾會比較難聽得出佢轉左另一首歌<br /><br />但編排上 medley的確係有起伏<br />而勁歌金曲係為左接岩個音而接 歌曲內容完全唔理<br />更加唔洗講要用咩樂器去突出某一首歌曲lovericnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682434583727919151.post-57446827013118395572012-02-02T05:54:10.344+08:002012-02-02T05:54:10.344+08:00古巨基 - 勁歌金曲3 真係好難聽好難聽...古巨基 - 勁歌金曲3 真係好難聽好難聽...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682434583727919151.post-51210920023349379342011-09-29T12:24:35.686+08:002011-09-29T12:24:35.686+08:00謝更正!其實我覺得前兩部已經是為做而做的了...謝更正!其實我覺得前兩部已經是為做而做的了...zerohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05335461532009544893noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682434583727919151.post-64155684167194388242011-09-28T23:20:24.039+08:002011-09-28T23:20:24.039+08:00同意作者所提到的歌曲結構編排問題,《勁歌金曲3—Party King》確實太勉強,有種為做而做的感覺...同意作者所提到的歌曲結構編排問題,《勁歌金曲3—Party King》確實太勉強,有種為做而做的感覺,比前兩部遜色得多(雖然前兩部為金牌旗下作品)。<br />*「瘡海遺珠」應為「滄海遺珠」。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682434583727919151.post-74692833115212852342011-09-27T23:29:34.255+08:002011-09-27T23:29:34.255+08:00我覺得選曲最重要有代表性,
如果你夾硬塞首「別講笑,小鳥爆開了」入去, 邊有人唱K 會唱?我覺得選曲最重要有代表性,<br />如果你夾硬塞首「別講笑,小鳥爆開了」入去, 邊有人唱K 會唱?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com